Pensiamo alla vita di un individuo nella nostra società. Quali sono gli elementi sui quali può basare la propria stabilità? Ad esempio la famiglia, il lavoro, ed il tempo libero. Per quanto banale è difficile pensare a come poter rinunciare ad una delle componenti citate.
Al contrario, più di 3 componenti possono da un lato incrementare le probabilità di successo ma dall'altro aumentare la complessità nel trovare il punto di equilibrio. Ad esempio per la più banale delle analogie si può affermare che uno sgabello si reggie perfettamente su 3 piedi ma la cosa diventa estremamente più complicata quando ne possiede 4.
For the same principle for which for 3 points a single plan can pass through, or the fact that the simplest geometric figure is represented by a triangle (polygon with 3 sides), is likely to think that essentialness and equilibrium, also are based on 3 elements fundamental.
Think of the life of an individual in our society. What elements on which it can base its stability? Eg. family, work and leisure. As trivial hard think about how to give up one of the components mentioned.
In contrast, more than 3 components may on the one hand increase probability of success but on the other hand increase the complexity in find the balance point. For example, for the most trivial of analogies we can say that a stool rests perfectly on 3 feet, but it becomes far more complicated when it possesses 4 feet.
Think of the life of an individual in our society. What elements on which it can base its stability? Eg. family, work and leisure. As trivial hard think about how to give up one of the components mentioned.
In contrast, more than 3 components may on the one hand increase probability of success but on the other hand increase the complexity in find the balance point. For example, for the most trivial of analogies we can say that a stool rests perfectly on 3 feet, but it becomes far more complicated when it possesses 4 feet.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento